“Contrary to common sense”

Pub date July 21, 2011
SectionPolitics Blog

It’s been my observation over 20 years in journalism that the politicians who most often refer to “common sense” tend not to possess it. And that was reinforced this morning when I got an email for Republican presidential candidate Michelle Bachman plugging a new television commercial opposing raising the nation debt ceiling.

“Dear Fellow Conservative,” it began, misreading her audience by a big way in my case, “I will not vote to increase the debt limit. Period.” And in the commercial, she follows this opening line with, “It goes completely contrary to common sense.”

With six words, she tortures not just grammar, but also the very notion of common sense. Because it make not one iota of sense to let the U.S. default on its debts, lower its credit rating and artificially jack up interest rates, simply because these ignorant Tea Party fools don’t like the size and scope of the federal government.

If the people really agreed with the right-wingers’ plans to gut government, Bachman would have the votes in Congress and the White House to make deep cuts during the normal budget process, which common sense should indicate is the proper time to make budget cuts. But instead, she and other conservatives are pandering to ignorant yahoos who think greatly reducing government will somehow help the economy, when actually it would kill economic growth.

“When times are tight for your family or mine, we know that’s not the time to call the credit card company and ask for a higher credit limit. But that’s what many elected officials in Washington are suggesting we do for our nation, right in the midst of an economic crisis!” Bachman argues.

Clearly, Bachman has never actually been in the position of having to make the tough decisions between buying groceries for your kids and refusing to take on more debt, because many families often do choose the former. And no matter what cash-strapped families decide, they also usually look at ways to increase their revenue, something Bachman and the conservative refuse to do, for ideological reasons that make no sense.

But that’s really beside the point, because there is no equivalency between family and federal budgets. While it is certainly true that Congress and President Obama should take steps to reduce the budget deficit – hopefully addressing the ridiculously high and growing wage and wealth gaps in the process, problems directly connected to the ballooning federal debt – no reputable economist would support the deep cuts Bachman advocates while the unemployment rates are as high as they are.

And when the time comes to start making deep cuts in government spending, we should start with the military budget, because it’s the lion’s share of the budget and ultimately an investment that harms our species. It’s just common sense.