Facebook RSS Twitter
Sign in Join
  • <-- Back to 48hills.org
Sign in
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Create an account
Sign up
Welcome!Register for an account
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Password recovery
Recover your password
Search
Logo48 hillsIndependent San Francisco News + Culture
Logo48 hillsIndependent San Francisco News + Culture
  • Archive Home
  • Flip-through editions
  • Stories from print sections
    • News & Opinion
      • Alerts
      • Editorial
      • Editors Notes
      • Green City
      • Herbwise
      • The Mix
      • Opinion
      • Techspoitation
    • Arts & Culture
      • Alt.sex.column
      • Art Listings
      • Astrology
      • Club Guide
      • Dance
      • Film Features
      • Film Reviews
      • Gamer
      • Literature
      • Music
      • Music Features
      • Rep Clock
      • Sonic Reducer
      • Stage
      • Super Ego
      • Theater
      • Visual Art
    • Food & Drink
      • Cheap Eats
      • Restaraunts
      • Restaurant Review
    • Special
  • Stories from SFBG.com
    • Bruce Blog
    • Noise
      • Party Radar
    • Pixel Vision
    • Politics Blog
    • Sex Blog
    • SF Blog
    • Video Pick
    • Without Reservations

Should ‘Lost”s Kate just die and put us out of our misery?

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Linkedin
ReddIt
Email
Print
    Pub date May 18, 2009
    WriterMusic Blogger
    SectionPixel Vision

    Kate Lost.jpg
    Lost girl Kate Austen (Evangeline Lilly) throws a come-hither, hey-big-boy-wanna-get-shipwrecked-on-a-desert-island look our way.

    By Kimberly Chun

    Spoiler alert for all those still sitting on the Lost finale that aired May 13 – because I love all those noisy Facebook friends that (plane-)wreck season closers for me on a regular basis.

    The latest came from sometime-Guardian contributor Oliver Wang, weighing in on Lost‘s fifth season end-game. “Last night’s Lost had some good aspects,” he opined on Facebook. “The introduction of Jacob was interesting, as well as a new twist on John Locke, but Jack and Juliet’s justifications for setting off the h-bomb were some of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard on the show.” In the comments, he continued: “I should also add, the show would be so much better if Kate died. Ya’ll know I speak the truth.” One mob-rules comment: “Kill Kate!!!!”

    I kind of have to agree with Wang and the Kate haters. How’s that for waffling – and doesn’t the Kate character deserves a flip-flop or two after five seasons of footloose and fancy-free Jack-or-Sawyer-or-Jack-or-Sawyer, stepfather-murdering-but-psycho-Ben-saving waffling on her part. For a character that can behind nearly anything in the name of rescue, loyalty to friends or lovers, and island community, Kate got strangely sanctimonious when it came to setting off the nuke (an act that meant trusting the calculations of physicist Daniel Faraday, played compellingly by Jeremy Davies (it helps), who determined that the ’70s-bound returnees had to set off a long-buried hydrogen bomb in order to prevent the construction of the Swan station, which would later cause the crash of Oceanic Flight 815).

    • Writer
    • Music Blogger
    Facebook
    Twitter
    WhatsApp
    Linkedin
    ReddIt
    Email
    Print

      48hills.org is the official publication of the non-profit San Francisco Progressive Media Center.
      Contact us: info@48hills.org